For those who know the habits of our enemies this execution was expected, not a surprise. I fully expect we will be seeing more Americans having their heads cut off while still alive.

Up until September '01 I left off my bio the fact that I spent a year of my life 8 to 5, mon-fri. studying classified documents on the Middle-East, Middle East terrorists, etc. [6th Special Forces Group (Airborne) G-2, S-2]

I know for a fact (because they have told me so) that I have friends reading this who in their heart know that we Americans in Iraq can do good. That by building medical clinics, schools, delivering water, sewer and electricity, the people of Iraq will "love" us, that they will see Americans are charitable, caring, selfless people.

Time for a reality check:

Iraq under Saddam was one of (if not the most) secular countries in the Middle-East. The 1/4 million Christians openly and freely practiced Christianity (as they had for centuries) . One of the top people in the Iraqi government was a Christian. Sharia (Islamic law) was NOT the law of the land.

We, (the U.S.A.) thru our Congress, invaded a sovereign state. For those that don't know, that dear friends, is a violation of international law.

There's no such thing as a U.N. resolution, or U.S. Congressional resolution, that can change this.

We invaded a country that was at peace, that did not have the means or desire to cause harm to the U.S.A., that did not give aid or comfort to International Terrorists, that did not have Weapons of Mass Destruction.

and.....

The whole world knows this.

But,......John....... We're AMERICANS. We're the GOOD GUYS!!!!!!

Really?

The anguish over mistreatment of Iraqi prisoners? Wait a minute. Here's how the other side see's all this:

While Americans see a "coalition of forces", Islamic's see a Christian army invading an Islamic country.

Photos of G.I.'s with 8 to 10 year old smiling Iraqi children will not change the reality of a centuries old culture.

OUR ARMY

With all the finger pointing about the prisoner mistreatment photos and who bears responsibility. We should understand a few things:

Training, command and control of any army is done by the heart and soul of that army. The heart and soul being the senior NCO Corps.

I know my conservative Republican friends don't like to hear this , but the destruction of the military under Bill Clinton was, for the most part, merely a continuation of G.H.W. Bush policies.

Beginning in the early 1990's senior sergeant's were:

1.) Offered financial incentives to retire early.

2.) Forced to endure endless meetings in the areas of "politically correct" matters regarding integration of women into the Corps. the environment. homosexuals and more.

3.) Subject to a "hostile" environment for retention in general, especially Vietnam veterans.

SO. in 2004..... we have 25 year old's supervising 19 year olds. Throw women into the mix and..... well.... you can see the results.

I must close for now, other commitments calling.

Please forward this article to anyone you see fit.

Melting ice: Fact & Fiction

The Guardian, a British newspaper (on 7/14/04), published an article about global warming and concentrated on the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere to make their point.

Slight problem:

While, yes the Earth is in fact warming, it's warming from the inside! As evidence I point to the drastic melts we are seeing at both poles.

1.) The ice at the North Pole has completely melted (something never before observed since modern man has had access)

2.) Both Larsen "A" and Larsen "B" ice shelf's have melted in the Antarctic and fallen into the ocean.

Neither of these events happened because of increases in ambient air temperature due to increases CO2, rather these events happened because of the ocean and ground warming.

Therefore, the CO2 argument is a flight of fancy, or fiction.

However,

The article mentions how the levels of the oceans would rise 110 meters (330 feet) if the Antarctic ice were to completely melt.

Not only is this fact, it's already commenced to happen!

Unfortunately, The Guardian newspaper has a socialist agenda and the slant of the article is to promote same in their support of the Kyoto agreement on global warming.

Even if CO2 from human activity was a real problem, all the Kyoto agreement does is prohibit the industrialized nations from making more and allows 3rd world countries to go full steam ahead to make as much as they care to.

That's how you can tell this (Kyoto) is motivated by politics and not science. If CO2 from human activity was real science, you'd see no exceptions for 3rd world countries to produce more CO2..........None.

The foregoing is such an easy concept to comprehend I wonder why it's not pointed out publicly?

REALITY CHECK:

1.) There is Global Warming taking place.

2.) All areas of human habitation below 400 feet above sea level are at risk, ( which by the way, we're talking about the infrastructure that supports 75% to 85% of the Earth's population).

3.) It's in no way connected to human related activity.

4.) While the complete melting of the Antarctic Ice is (for the time being) remote, the melting of the Ross ice shelf (also in Antarctica) is a very real matter. Estimates vary from a 16 or 18 foot to 36 foot rise in sea levels from this body (Ross Ice Shelf) of ice sliding into the ocean.

IN CONCLUSION

The Ross Ice Shelf has been known for decades to be at risk of sliding into the ocean. It has been carefully monitored by the world's governments for decades as well.

Please be advised that the Ross Ice Shelf is in fact on the move and commencing it's slide into the ocean. No, it won't be today or tomorrow, but it's moving and gathering speed (speed being a rather relative term). The best scientists on the planet were completely wrong about the fate of Larsen "A" and Larsen"B" ice shelves. Both broke away from the Antarctic Continent and melted in a fraction of the scientist's predicted time. These were the masses holding the Ross Ice Shelf in place, and they're gone!

Regards,

John Moore

Abrupt Climate Change

------------

From: JOHN MOORE [JRLIBERTY@webtv.net]

Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 2:41 PM

To: Jrliberty@webtv.net

Subject:

Abrupt Climate Change

August 25, 2005

During the past several years since 2001 when I first became aware of the entire Planet-X and Earthchanges matter I have learned a lot - I have interviewed numerous people. Pretty much at least an hour a day for more than four years has been devoted to these matters and this issue.

I have been on a nationwide speaking tour on this topic. I have interviewed experts on my radio show.

Despite all I've accomplished, I've yet to convince a number of people I love and care deeply about that this matter is a clear and present danger. It is my hope and prayer that my writing this monograph and the attached article will be a step in that direction.

The issue this article will deal with is Abrupt Climate Change. I hope to effectively communicate the following:

1.) That drastic, severe, and rapid climate change is supported by hard scientific evidence.

2.) That this same scientific evidence points to these changes being already well under way and that they will gain momentum.

Attached is the unclassified executive summary of: "An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and It's Implications for United States Security” By Peter Schwartz and Doug Randall of the Global Business Network. This report was commissioned and paid for by the U.S. Department of Defense. (D.O.D.)

I first became aware of this report shortly after it was written. Up until today I had only read (at most) articles that were perhaps two page summaries of this 14-page article.

I'm still working on getting my hands on the classified version. This brings to mind a question: What on earth could be worse than what's discussed in the unclassified Executive Summary?

While I have little hope of obtaining the classified version, I do have access to people with privileged information regarding these matters.

What I hear from them is of a most disturbing nature.

After you read the article we again come back to the key question: that being.......

TIMING

In the two years since the report was released in October 2003 we have learned a lot.

We have seen confirming evidence that the warning of the authors is very well advised in that these abrupt climate changes are happening.

A key phrase in the article is:

Positive Feedback Loop.

In layman's terms this is when each effect on the climate and earth accelerates the warming pattern.

Another key phrase:

The Thermohaline System also known as the Gulf Stream, Atlantic Conveyor. or The North Atlantic Thermohaline Conveyor.

This warm water circulation system is under intense scientific scrutiny and for very good reason that being .........It's in the beginning stages of shutting down!

And finally the phrase:

Sea Levels Rise

Yes, the sea levels will rise. Not only does the DOD report say so, I have numerous private sources telling me the same thing.

THE BOTTOM LINE? The answer to the question of TIMING?

The time we have between today and when these events become apparent to the general population is the real concern.

At that point in time making prudent preparations will be difficult and very expensive as the demand for certain items like real estate in areas known to be safe, or non-hybrid garden seeds, or the more desirable communications equipment or, well lets just say I can make a long list of items relatively inexpensive now (because of low demand) that would become very scarce and very expensive.

I know from personal experience that one cannot make proper, prudent preparations in a short span of time (a year or less).

I also know that the U.S. Government has been making preparations for these events since at least 1980, if not earlier.

Want to know more? Go to my website, I have a list of websites and books on this matter.

Regards,

John Moore

http://www.thelibertyman.com/

314-965-3007